If the Gujarat Government’s theory of Godhra being a pre-planned conspiracy was indeed the truth, why did their lead investigator need to resort to bribing the witnesses? Why couldn’t they create a foolproof case, with more reliable witnesses? Why did they have to change their own charge-sheet after the forensic reports?
Why couldn’t UPA nail down Modi in 10 years of its rule? The answer lies in Commissions of enquiry act precluding central government from appointing another commission for the same purpose.
The SIT was dominated by the cops from Gujarat Police, the same organisation whose senior officers were accused of colluding with the rioters.
SIT Investigations have failed to establish a “Chain of Responsibility”. There are no challenges to claims made by Modi.
Modi lied about being unaware of the presence of two ministers in control room. SIT failed to investigate these minister’s roles in conjunction with their phone records
It is almost certain that the investigation to find Pandya’s killer was DELIBERATELY botched up. Why would a former Home Minister’s death be treated so shabbily that even fundamentals of the investigation were incorrect?
Modi delivered a Hate speech at Becharaji, harassed the officer who provided its details to the National Minorities Commission, then denied doing either.
SIT failed to look into the video evidence freely available on the internet that shows Modi justifying and contextualizing the genocide as a reaction to Godhra, and asked questions about the other statements that he was able to give evasive responses to.
Not only a blatant lie to the SIT by Modi, but contradicted by him in answer to a later question.Yet no challenge by the toothless SIT
SIT falsely assumed a claim to have been made by Pandya, and then used it to discredit his testimony to the CCT.