The Godhra Fire

If the Gujarat Government’s theory of Godhra being a pre-planned conspiracy was indeed the truth, why did their lead investigator need to resort to bribing the witnesses? Why couldn’t they create a foolproof case, with more reliable witnesses? Why did they have to change their own charge-sheet after the forensic reports?

Nanavati Commission

Why couldn’t UPA nail down Modi in 10 years of its rule? The answer lies in Commissions of enquiry act precluding central government from appointing another commission for the same purpose.


The SIT was dominated by the cops from Gujarat Police, the same organisation whose senior officers were accused of colluding with the rioters.

Shortcomings of SIT

SIT Investigations have failed to establish a “Chain of Responsibility”. There are no challenges to claims made by Modi.

Ministers in Police Control Rooms

Modi lied about being unaware of the presence of two ministers in control room. SIT failed to investigate these minister’s roles in conjunction with their phone records

Haren Pandya’s murder

It is almost certain that the investigation to find Pandya’s killer was DELIBERATELY botched up. Why would a former Home Minister’s death be treated so shabbily that even fundamentals of the investigation were incorrect?

Hate speech at Becharaji

Modi delivered a Hate speech at Becharaji, harassed the officer who provided its details to the National Minorities Commission, then denied doing either.

Action-reaction justifications

SIT failed to look into the video evidence freely available on the internet that shows Modi justifying and contextualizing the genocide as a reaction to Godhra, and asked questions about the other statements that he was able to give evasive responses to.

1 2